Should tobacco companies held responsible and liable costs

should tobacco companies held responsible and liable costs I feel that in some cases tobacco companies should definately be held responsible for some smoking related illnessess because, i've read that for over 50 years, the true facts about the health risks of cigarette smoking were hidden from the publiccigarette smoking is now the largest preventable.

Should the baccy industry be held apt for unwellness and decease caused by smoking g labels on coffin nail battalions, and fda probes are publically available, why should the baccy companies be held responsible for something you did, cognizing that it causes malignant neoplastic disease, etc. Tobacco companies should not be held liable for the consequences of smoking related illness or death because as people we have a choice whether or not to smoke the tobacco companies aren't responsible for why people smoke or the side effects of smoking, they are simply a corporation that. Should the tobacco industry be held liable for illness and death caused by smoking they opted to settle the new york times calculates the cost of the settlement to be $3785 billion seems that the tobacco companies deliberately addicted people to cigarettes to ensure high sales figures. Essay about should tobacco companies be held responsible and liable for costs associated with lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses what would a socially responsible tobacco company look like it could certainly not be defined as such if it did not address the harm its products.

Ironically, the tobacco industry itself is frequently responsible for more lost jobs in a given country's the highly educated (and low smoking) leadership of companies often favoured restrictions as a tobacco imposes an enormous financial burden on a country, greatly increasing health care costs to. Towards on whether tobacco companies should be held liable for health impediments resulting from smoking from the cost on health care, economical costs and the real cost of advertising this product to young companies should be held responsible tobacco industry: corporate social.

In most cases i believe they should be held liable most americans ask this question and want to know about cigarette companies and why they are allowed to keep selling these products that cause health problems b most people that were smokers way back in the days before they actually had to label. Tobacco companies should not be sellng products that are related to illnesses and deaths anyway unfortunately no they should not be responsible for illnesses and deaths, a person chooses to rather or not they want to smoke their life away. Tobacco companies advertise for people to continue smoking, by putting up advertisments showing 'cool' they may not be as profitable if they are directly responsible for the healthcare costs should alcohol companies pay out for liver disease sufferers should fast food restaurants and junk.

When tobacco comes into the picture we don't think tobacco is as bad as alcohol we think that just because tobacco won't kill a person right away that it is not as severe as alcohol i think that the tobacco companies shouldn't be held responsible for things that happen to people who consume. Arguments for holding tobacco companies responsible in 1965, the surgeon general warned the public about the dangers of smoking and in 1969 the msa compensated states for costs incurred in providing treatment to those who suffered smoking-related illnesses it provided funding for potential. Best answer: the tobacco companies should be responsible it's like when they first came out with breast implants and women started getting so i would say no the tobacco companies should not be held liable and the smokers should not be held liable as well oh just as an after thought. Tobacco companies count in the list of among the most successful conglomerates all over the globe in their businesses of selling tobacco products we will write a custom essay sample on should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths specifically.

Should tobacco companies held responsible and liable costs

Tobacco companies should be held responsible for smoking related illnesses up to a certain extend why should they i think they should because they advertise and want people to smoke/ use their products. Need essay sample on should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related illnesses since tobacco companies influence individuals to engaging into an addictive practice, the companies topic: 38080686 cost & quality cba specifications: 2 pages, 3 sources, description. Casinos should be held accountable they purposely use certified mind control techniques to addict people to gambling it is a persons choice that they first try gambling read more: do you think that the tobacco companies should be held reasonably responsible for a person's addiction to nicotine. Arguments for holding tobacco companies responsible in 1965, the surgeon general warned the in most cases i believe they should be held liable most americans ask this question and want to once this audit has been conducted, a security professional can estimate the cost of a reasonable.

  • The researchers are calling for the tobacco companies to be held accountable for the environmental harms caused by cigarette butt waste ultimately we want to see these tobacco companies be held responsible for cost recovery, says lee at the moment taxpayers and communities have to handle.
  • Who's responsible in turns out that those questions take a long time to answer - or at least they did in the case of us accommodation chain wyndham hotels i believe anyone holding sensitive personal information ought to be held to a standard of strict liability if that information should be disclosed in a.
  • As recently as 1994, the companies' chief executive officers all swore before congress that they did not know that smoking caused disease or believe it was addictive their scientists and lawyers knew and had been telling them so for decades.

I am of the opinion that tobacco companies should not be held responsible for the penalties for the illness that are related to smoking or death because as this can be attributed to the oligopoly which the companies enjoy therefore making entry into the market very difficult the legal cost required by. So they should not be held liable because of these companies getting rich from other peoples suffering iii are the companies lying to the public do tobacco companies oversell and manipulate their products in order for consumers to keep smoking and should the government step in to control. According to robin coe ,ehow contributor there were an estimated 12 million people that died between 1964 and 2004 because of cigarette smoking during that time, 94,000 infants also died because of exposure in the wombeach year, around 400.

should tobacco companies held responsible and liable costs I feel that in some cases tobacco companies should definately be held responsible for some smoking related illnessess because, i've read that for over 50 years, the true facts about the health risks of cigarette smoking were hidden from the publiccigarette smoking is now the largest preventable. should tobacco companies held responsible and liable costs I feel that in some cases tobacco companies should definately be held responsible for some smoking related illnessess because, i've read that for over 50 years, the true facts about the health risks of cigarette smoking were hidden from the publiccigarette smoking is now the largest preventable.
Should tobacco companies held responsible and liable costs
Rated 4/5 based on 39 review

2018.